Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people executed for homosexuality

:{{la|List of people executed for homosexuality}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_people_executed_for_homosexuality Stats])

:({{Find sources|List of people executed for homosexuality}})

There are only 7 names listed which are also listen on List of people who were executed#Homosexuality Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of people who were executed#Homosexuality. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 16:07, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:* !Voting on your own proposal is redundant. Warden (talk) 19:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

• Keep - In my estimation, this is an encyclopedic topic. Much work to be done, but that's neither here nor there. Clear inclusion criteria, limited in scope. Carrite (talk) 16:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

• Keep Seems to be a reasonable split and even if it weren't, the remedy would be merging back into the larger list, not deletion. Warden (talk) 19:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
• Keep {{expand list}} needed not AFD. Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
• Keep At least as encyclopedic a topic as List of people executed by the Tudors, if only in my opinion. Eventually, as more people are added to the list, the section on List of people who were executed will be just a brief description and maybe one or two of the most notable, and this will be the main go-to for people wanting a more comprehensive list. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 20:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
• Keep and remove list from List of people who were executed, preserving wikilink. List of people who were executed is too general to keep as a single list, so breaking it up makes sense. --Colapeninsula (talk) 22:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
• Keep: Notable topic. SL93 (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
• Keep, notable and encyclopedic and educational. — Cirt (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
• Keep. Eminently expandable (I'm about to add a name), so the nominator's rationale that it can be kept in another article fails. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.