Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of royal weddings

:{{la|List of royal weddings}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_royal_weddings Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|List of royal weddings}})

Monarchies have existed for thousands of years. There have been millions of royal weddings. The article tells us that weddings of senior members of royal families are state occasions and attract national and international interest but then goes on to list weddings of "minor" royals and medieval marriage ceremonies that definitely did not attract any media attention. What could possibly be the point of this article anyway? Surtsicna (talk) 15:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

: Delete - Clear violation of WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not a repository of lists. There's no particular need for this page, and as the nominator stated, there's been millions of royal weddings. Amsgearing (talk) 16:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

• Keep but pare down to only notable weddings (i.e. those with articles) per WP:CLT for :Category:Royal weddings and its subcats. It probably meets WP:LISTN too, though I didn't do any searches so I can't prove that. ansh666 02:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm afraid I can't support deletion on this one. The WP:CLT component is satisfied and the topic is notable enough for WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 09:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
• Keep Agree with the previous two editors. --Marbe166 (talk) 15:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

• Keep Perfectly legit list. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
• Keep. 211, 12, 14. Herostratus (talk) 02:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.