Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of websites by Alexa rank

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[List of websites by Alexa rank]]=

:{{la|List of websites by Alexa rank}} ([{{fullurl:List of websites by Alexa rank|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of websites by Alexa rank}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Wikipedia is not an Alexa.com mirror. Possibly violates copyright [http://www.bitlaw.com/copyright/database.html]. In any case, an external link at the article for Alexa Internet is sufficient. --- RockMFR 07:03, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete: As well as the concerns listed in the nomination, the information in this article will require constant updating. Sure, this information may be useful, but this is a service better provided by the Alexa website. -- saberwyn 07:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: Wikipedia is not a collection of links. I agree with above arguments too -- Anshuk (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Despite the fact that I think it's pretty nifty, it still has no place on Wikipedia, is a possible WP:COI of the link mentioned above by RockMFR and is covered by Alexa itself amply. Doc StrangeTelepathic MessagesStrange Frequencies 08:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: a link will do, and will avoid the update problem. Voice-of-All 10:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Unmaintainable list. Blueboy96 13:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom and the opinions stated above.BWH76 (talk) 14:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Copyright violation. Redirect to Alexa. Mostlyharmless (talk) 23:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: this type of information will always be so fluid that it can never be maintained as an encyclopedic article. A clear example of what Wikipedia is not, in my opinion. -- Ekjon Lok (talk) 03:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • delete per Ekojn, Doc, nom and nom. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, seriously. - Master Bigode from SRK.o//(Talk) (Contribs) 13:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per Doc Strange. 72.197.119.39 (talk) 02:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Err, that was supposed to be me; I forgot that I'm not signed in. DiamondDragon DESU 02:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. While I'm sure a bot could be programmed to maintain such a list (thus striking the "unmaintainable list" argument) I just don't see the point. RFerreira (talk) 19:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.