Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Is Dying

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Living Is Dying]]=

:{{la|Living Is Dying}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Living_Is_Dying Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Living Is Dying}})

Fails WP:NSONG. Article was created by a SPA with a likely COI, see Special:Contributions/LisaGolding. Hrodvarsson (talk) 19:46, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep No COI. Noticed a need for the article and created it. Passes WP:NALBUM. Meets criteria 1, 6, and 7 for Recordings. Physical release of single with B-sides indicated it met the requirements for own article. But, understandably could be redirected to album page or artist page. LisaGolding (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

:: This is a song, not an album. Also the album itself does not meet NALBUM. Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete: fails WP:NSONG. Sources are entirely primary (artist or record company's own websites), passing mentions in interviews where Threatin speaks about his own songs (also primary sources) or user-generated content (Discogs, iMDb). Richard3120 (talk) 00:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete - Cannot say this meets any of notability requirements for songs when we can hardly verify the song itself in reliable sources.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete - No evidence of notability that would satisfy WP:NSONG. Hzh (talk) 10:28, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete as per previous !voters, the article does not pass NSONG. In the absence of NSONG criteria it would need to meet GNG, which it does not. Chetsford (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete - There is an obvious lack of reliable and significant coverage for this song. The editor of the various articles on Threatin got a bit carried away trying to show notability, but per WP:EXIST this song does not merit an article just because it was released. It has not been noticed otherwise. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.