Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Los Sures

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Living Los Sures}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Los Sures}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Living Los Sures}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 05:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Living Los Sures]]=

:{{la|1=Living Los Sures}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Living Los Sures}})

Fails WP:GNG. A non-notable neighborhood/film project within NYC, with no reliable sources found to establish said notability. Also reads as a promotional piece. Tinton5 (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.