Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Localizationism
=[[Localizationism]]=
:{{la|Localizationism}} ([{{fullurl:Localizationism|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Localizationism}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
WP:OR and possibly WP:Advertising. Either this is the artist's own term for his own work, in which case it's probable non WP:Notable, or, if it's a more general term, then this article is inappropriate because it explains the topic entirely in terms of one person's work. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:59, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete unless better references produced. No results on a search of the [http://www.biennial.com/ Liverpool Biennial site], but not all artists involved in some way will be notable [http://www.biennial.com/content/Footer/Involvementasanartist.aspx]. If the artist is notable, this should be converted to a much reduced bio. But I rather doubt that he is. Johnbod (talk) 13:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. A quick reading suggests almost all of the article is direct quotation from the artist concerned, and is therefore a copyvio. JulesH (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy delete since Jules's suspicion is confirmed [http://www.artistportfolio.net/index.php?secret=140&artist_id=16584 here]. Gotta love the rolling lave and the flying steed that is art, though. Drmies (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.