Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Randolph

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As notability has not been established through significant coverage in reliable sources. Davewild (talk) 09:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

=[[Logan Randolph]]=

:{{la|Logan Randolph}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Logan_Randolph Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Logan Randolph}})

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. Most references do not even mention subject and includes press release. No in-depth coverage or support. reddogsix (talk) 04:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Oppose. This article should not be deleted because multiple independent, reliable sources have provided significant coverage WP:GNG. The individual's work has been noted elsewhere on Wikipedia and is sufficient to establish notability.Wikitam331 (talk) 08:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. "Multiple independent, reliable sources have provided significant coverage" for this 23-year-old? Really? I don't see even one. The first two cites in the article don't mention the subject; the third is one sentence in a press release from his then-college; fourth is some local blog; fifth is a short event listing in a free weekly paper. Not much else to be found on the web, beyond subject's personal blog: "I'm an entrepreneur, student, climber and hustler." WP:NOTPROMOTION. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.