Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logicomix

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

=[[Logicomix]]=

:{{la|Logicomix}} ([{{fullurl:Logicomix|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logicomix}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Future comic; fails notability per WP:CRYSTAL Chzz ► 11:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

:*Close Article already deleted. Junk Police (talk) 12:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Neutrally comment' I still can't find how the Google search for it.Junk Police (talk) 12:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 06:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 10:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —I'^mperator 12:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Keep - Be kind to philosophical literature. Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 00:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete per nom and JamesBurns. Junk Police (talk) 00:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.