Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 251

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of bus routes in London. Sandstein 07:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

=[[London Buses route 251]]=

:{{la|London Buses route 251}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/London_Buses_route_251 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|London Buses route 251}})

Another generic bus route, no evidence of notability. Jeni ^(talk) 12:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Comment Do other London bus routes have their own article, just out of curiosity/amusement ? But any historical English nobleman below the rank of Baronet is routinely purged as "non-notable".... Ryn78 (talk) 15:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 15:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 15:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Delete as non notable. {{ping|Ryn78}} There are a few left, admittedly most like this one that fail WP:GNG and WP:NOTTRAVEL. Nordic Dragon 15:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Applying WP:NOTTRAVEL seems appropriate; if we were to accept this across the board we'd have another shitstorm on our hands, no doubt. But this seems to fail the GNG, for instance. And even if this and other routes passed the GNG, that wouldn't necessarily make their schedules notable, with all the stops and the symbols ({{rail-interchange|london|underground}}, {{rail-interchange|london|bus}}) and whatnot. Drmies (talk) 01:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment. There are 135 articles like this in :Category:Bus routes in London, not to mention a few hundred other city bus routes using Template:Infobox bus line. This isn't the first one. Most have references such as this did before much of the content was removed. StarryGrandma (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

::Were those references independent? Ian.thomson (talk) 06:59, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Redirect to List of bus routes in London as {{u|Jeni}} attempted to do before having to waste everyone's time and drag this to AfD. Nothing about this route is notable. It exists. Period. Article sat unsourced for years. When Jeni attempted to change it into a redirect, an IP added some references, none of which were independent, which only showed that this route exists, not that it was notable. Nothing in searches to show that this route passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete as notable bus route - There's thousands of bus routes and not every single one (even in London) needs an article ...., Fails nottravel & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.