Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Sparr

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is clearly not to keep this. As Reyk points out, there is nothing which could reasonably be merged elsewhere, and so I am closing this as delete PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Lord Sparr]]=

:{{la|Lord Sparr}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Lord Sparr}})

Article does not demonstrate notability per WP:NOTE; also, guides like WP:PLOT tell us that we are not a compendium of mere plot, which is all this article is. It contains no real-world development or reception data, and just re-hashes the plot of the series. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Redirect to main page for novel, Sadads (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Merge to novel series, trimming appropriately in the process. Jclemens (talk) 17:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete or merge Fails WP:N. Harry Blue5 (talk) 10:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete- There is no assertion of notability outside the series. A merge is inappropriate because there is no content besides unsourced plot summary, which the obvious merge target already has enough of. Reyk _YO! 01:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.