Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lore m. dickey
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
=[[Lore m. dickey]]=
:{{la|Lore m. dickey}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Lore m. dickey}})
promotional cv , fails WP:PROF. . As even the article says in its lede sentence, an " early career American psychologist". Early career is just what be mean by Not Yet Notable, and the article pretty much proves it: No significant citations: citations of his work: 26, 10, 7, 3, 3, 2. DGG ( talk ) 01:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Very self-promotional text and tone. Even if fixed, not seeing what in the content would meet PROF or GNG. — James Cantor (talk) 13:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 7. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete psychologists whose work does not rise to the level of being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page for an "an early career American psychologist". K.e.coffman (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.