Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Haigh

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BJ^Talk 09:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Lori Haigh]]=

:{{la|Lori Haigh}} ([{{fullurl:Lori Haigh|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Haigh}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Another woman suing over abuse by a priest. Whilst the phenomenon is notable, the individual victim is not, sorry. This is news for a bit and forget stuff, (1EBLP) - not "record for ever in a bio". (The individual claims and details in this are also without direct referencing, but that's beside the point). Scott Mac (Doc) 22:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete - Person notable for one event only. Jd027 (talk) 23:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Facepalm, indeed. "Lori has since closed her gallery and has kept a relatively low profile." Yes, so low that we shouldn't have ever had an article on her. Mahalo. --Ali'i 15:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete - Person notable for one event only --Cameron Scott (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.