Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lou Cristillo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. kur ykh 00:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Lou Cristillo]]=

:{{la|Lou Cristillo}} ([{{fullurl:Lou Cristillo|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lou Cristillo}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Weak delete. WP:ACADEMIC, article consisting of wikilinked version of peacocky academic bio and unencyclopedic CV-like list of times quoted. Has [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=louis+cristillo+columbia&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&ned=&ie=UTF-8 occasionally been quoted], but not the subject of significant independent coverage. Handful of Google scholar cites, though many are apparently for his father. More notable people have been deleted; less notable people have been kept. I put it out there for discussion since this article hasn't been touched since the 9/07 tagging. Orphan. THF (talk) 15:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Weak delete. Does not seem to pass WP:PROF, and he has [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Louis+Abdellatif+Cristillo%22 a little press] but it mostly seems to be trivial mentions that would not pass muster for WP:BIO. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete Like the above editors, I am unable to find more evidence of notablity. --Crusio (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Pass neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO in a clear-cut way, at the moment. Has a good chance of becoming notable in the future, but not quite there yet, in my opinion.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.