Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Isack Kumar
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
=[[Louis Isack Kumar]]=
:{{la|Louis Isack Kumar}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Louis Isack Kumar}})
Non notable educator; fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF. The article subject is an academic but teaches at a secondary school and wouldn't pass the academics' notability guidelines. I couldn't find coverage in the media either which would enable it to pass GNG. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. For now essentially fails WP:V for most of the facts listed in the article. Even just a plain google search for his name returns rather little, and almost nothing that would satisfy WP:V. Almost nothing is referenced in the article itself, including no references for the various awards mentioned there. As things stand, delete. Nsk92 (talk) 03:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as noticeably troubled and nothing for any basic notability and its improvements. SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.