Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Rowley

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:40, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Louis Rowley]]=

:{{la|Louis Rowley}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Louis_Rowley Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Louis Rowley}})

Contested PROD. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL, has not played at a senior level in a fully pro league. JMHamo (talk) 14:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 15:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete per everyone above - Fails NFOOTIE. –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Delete - He hasn't played in a Fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps either therefore he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. IJA (talk) 11:46, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.