Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Justice International
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Love Justice International}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Justice International}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Love Justice International}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Love Justice International]]=
:{{la|1=Love Justice International}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Love Justice International}})
Fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP/WP:SIGCOV. Article lacks independent sources and I could not find any. I sympathize with their stated goals, but that does not suffice. Kleuske (talk) 06:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Christianity, and Nebraska. Kleuske (talk) 06:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- :*Delete: Page is almost entirely unsourced. Googling "Love Justice International" come up with a decent number of references by similar anti-human trafficking sites but nothing that meets WP:Reliable. "Tiny Hands International" elucidates even fewer hits with only 4 mentions in the news, total. In this editor's humble opinion, there is likely not enough out there to save this page from AfD. The only chance this article may have is if the page is completely redone and even then the sources won't be of any particular quality. Etrius ( Us) 02:38, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- :*:Comment: Funny enough, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Love_Justice_International&diff=372455479&oldid=365255299&diffmode=source original page] when first created was.... not the best, but had a few decent citations. The decent ciations all just 404 now. Looking at the original creator's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Yetimike79 contributions] a cynical part of me wants to call WP:COI. Etrius ( Us) 02:41, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.