Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Hardeman

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

=[[Lucas Hardeman]]=

:{{la|Lucas Hardeman}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd=Wikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2F{{urlencode:Lucas Hardeman}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Lucas Hardeman}})

Non-notable per WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources apart from passing mention in Newsweek article (cited). Last article of a former Wikipedia:Walled garden, the rest of which have been speedied or AFD'd: see creator's user talk page. Under-referenced section on early and personal life suggests WP:COI or WP:AUTOBIO: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lucas_Hardeman&diff=prev&oldid=321129720#Education]. Prod contested by creator. MuffledThud (talk) 15:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete a delightfully written article that has no available sourcing per [http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Lucas+Hardeman%22 Google News], and nothing but social, personal, fan, or Self-published websites found with a regular [http://www.google.com/search?cf=all&hl=en&q=%22Lucas+Hardeman%22 Google search]. We might userfy it to its author until such time as Hardeman gets some recognition.... but as of now, the BLP fails inclusion criteria. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

:Comment agreed, especially about userfying: I suspect the subject will be notable in a few years' time. MuffledThud (talk) 09:39, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

:We'd be happy to userfy this page, until such a date as the subject is indeed notable according to the guidelines.

:Archer Drezelan (talk) 15:40, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

:Livewire legend (talk) 15:47, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

  • Dude, why should we be punished for some other jackass who blanked the page? Archer Drezelan and I both have admitted to our mistake. Do a checkuser on killercali; we don't know who that is! I'm asking to save the page, or userfy or whatever you call it; and to let us keep our accounts. That's all.Livewire legend (talk) 10:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The sources in the article are mostly blogs, websites that are affiliated with the subject, or passing mentions. A [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Lucas+Hardeman%22 Google News Archive search] returns no relevant results, and this is the same with a [http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Lucas+Hardeman%22 Google Books search]. This article should be deleted for failing Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Notability (people), and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Cunard (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.