Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Mendes

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Luke Mendes]]=

:{{la|Luke Mendes}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Luke Mendes}})

Non notable director. Gnews has minimal hits, does not pass WP:GNG Worm 14:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Apparently the author has the same name as the article. It is clearly a promotion only article. —Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 17:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete per nom. I couldn't find sources that could establish notability, and the only claim of notability that this article makes is a non-notable film. He fails WP:FILMMAKER for this reason, as his only work is not significant or well known. --Slon02 (talk) 21:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.