Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lupine Travel

:{{la|Lupine Travel}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lupine_Travel Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Lupine Travel}})

This is a profoundly non-notable company that was mentioned in passing in press coverage about a hoax some bogans once played. Guy (Help!) 17:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

:Keep- Even beyond the story you are citing, Lupine Travel has significant international media coverage to warrant an article, this includes almost every major British media organization. If we are to delete this one, then it has a domino effect as several others should be nominated for deletion too- TF92 (talk) 17:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC) {{article creator|TF92}}

:: See WP:OTHERSTUFF and slippery slope fallacy. See also churnalism. Guy (Help!) 17:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

:::Disagree, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Decisions_based_on_verifiable_evidence Wikipedia's Notability Guideline on organizations and companies states]: Wikipedia bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the organization or product. Notability requires only that these necessary sources have been published—even if these sources are not actually listed in the article yet (though in most cases it probably would improve the article to add them).--TF92 (talk) 18:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete although this article appear to be about one event rather than the agency, it has nothing to indicate the travel agency is any different to others in the same market. MilborneOne (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete appears to be promotional for the business, and the sources do not talk about the company. SportingFlyer (talk) 18:24, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, a few news stories because of its unusual remit, but very few actual customers. Szzuk (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete as not notable. Perhaps something could be merged into Tourism in North Korea. There are related discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tongil Tours and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Pioneer Tours. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - a small number of trivial mentions, insufficient to pass WP:GNG -- Euryalus (talk) 09:41, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom, fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.