Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Māori Wikipedia

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Māori Wikipedia]]=

:{{la|Māori Wikipedia}} ([{{fullurl:Māori Wikipedia|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Māori Wikipedia}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable Wiki language site, it has only less than 7,000 articles. No references or sources are found. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 10:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Wikipedias. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Wikipedias per the sentiments expressed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gan Wikipedia (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Sámi Wikipedia. Cunard (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Redirect, like all the other small Wikipedia versions without evidence of notability. Fram (talk) 07:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Māori is important as a language and as a culture. Have you really looked for sources in Māori? This and, indeed, all other language wikipedias should have articles. How does deleting this improve wikipedia? --Bduke (Discussion) 12:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

::Google is important, Belgium is (somewhat) important, does that make www.google.be automatically notable? It currently redirects to Google... If there are reliable, independent, indepth sources about the Maori Wikipedia, the article can of course be kept as a standa-lone. If these are absent, it should be redirected. The burden of finding sources is on those wanting to keep the article. Fram (talk) 08:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.