Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M61 Gas Mask

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BJTalk 05:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[M61 Gas Mask]]=

:{{la|M61 Gas Mask}} ([{{fullurl:M61 Gas Mask|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M61 Gas Mask}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

IMO this article does not meet the relevance criteria, because it is not specified why this gas mask should be on any significance or importance to have an article on it Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 00:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete exactly per nom, there's nothing to denote any significance of this product over any other. Nja247 08:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fritzpoll (talk) 16:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC){{SUBPAGENAME}}

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 09:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Very weak keep on the grounds that the article does not make NO claim to notability: its claim of ubiquity as one of the most common gas masks on the civilian market ought to qualify. -Toptomcat (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete if it was a common gas mask it would easily get third party coverage. [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&num=10&q=%22M61+Gas+Mask%22&cf=all], none that I could find from gnews. LibStar (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Notability has not been shown; lack of reliable sources. Esowteric | Talk 19:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep I don't think gas masks are going to get a lot of news coverage, or reviewed in major magazines. Not unless there are a lot of gas attacks somewhere, and people are seen surviving them with these things, or the news media otherwise mentions them. And its one of the most common gas masks on the market, so yeah, that makes it notable. Dream Focus 16:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.