Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MANU JONES

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

=[[MANU JONES]]=

:{{la|MANU JONES}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:MANU JONES}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|MANU JONES}})

No evidence of notability. Mostly self-referenced, advert in tone, with little or nothing turned up on Google. Article started numerous times by same account, with history of speedy deletes. Don't see that there's much here still. JNW (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete Self-referenced article about non-notable company with serious NPOV issues. Dac04 (talk) 21:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete Lack of any independent sourcing is a strong indicator of non-notability. Edward321 (talk) 23:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.