Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MEM Retail

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 04:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

=[[MEM Retail]]=

:{{la|MEM Retail}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MEM_Retail Stats])

:({{Find sources|MEM Retail}})

Apparently not notable--I have been unable to find any verifiable information other that that they went bankrupt in 2006, according to a [http://www.wimbledonguardian.co.uk/sport/1715646.devs_hampton_future_in_doubt/ UK local paper]

The web site being used as an external link is not operating. DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Delete No evidence of notability; even the reference above is more about an individual who had been associated with the firm. The award that they co-won would be the only claim to notability, if it were a notable award in itself, which it doesn't appear to be. AllyD (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Delete I couldn't find any reliable sources. --Cerebellum (talk) 23:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.