Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MJets

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 06:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

=[[:MJets]]=

:{{la|MJets}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MJets Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|MJets}})

Tiny airline ("fleet size: 10"). Does a bad job of asserting notability; all it really says that is that it exists. Eman 235/talk 10:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Keep. A fleet size of 10 is not tiny at all for a charter service (compare others under :Category:Charter airlines). Plenty of sustained news coverage that should easily satisfy the GNG.[https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/aviation/332132/jet-set-ready-for-take-off][https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/tourism-and-transport/946869/mjets-looks-to-export-successful-model-beyond-thailand][https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/tourism-and-transport/1237990/mjets-named-best-jet-handler-in-asia-in-poll][https://www.bangkokpost.com/news/general/600904/mjets-exceeds-global-safety-standards][https://www.bangkokpost.com/news/transport/1330683/chief-of-mjets-wary-of-private-jet-airport-plan] --Paul_012 (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Weak keep. The sources found by Paul are not terrible. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:58, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Keep per Paul_012 meets WP:GNG Lubbad85 (☎) 22:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Keep - per WP:GNG. Sources look good. BabbaQ (talk) 00:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep - for the reasons of those wanting to keep this article, article could use expanding though. Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.