Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MXlo

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=MXlo}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=MXlo}})

No sources, very scant usage of the term mxlo online. D1551D3N7 (talk) 00:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. D1551D3N7 (talk) 00:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete: Per nom. Best Regards (CP) 01:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - my own search also came up empty. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 22:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• Weak delete, sure, there is only a single source about this, but given the subject matter, it appears to me that it only ever would be obscure, but then that is when we are supposed to delete a page. If there is some policy or guideline I am missing, then we should consider that, a obscure DNS related record or something of course isn't going to get the same expected SIGCOV. Maybe verifiable technical manuals or something or ancient USENET records. Iljhgtn (talk) 01:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
• :No the source provided does not mention MXlo. It mentions MX record which has its own article. MXlo is about setting MX record to point to localhost which could be a note on the MX record page if it was a relevant idea (even historically) but I don't think it has that much merit. D1551D3N7 (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.