Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macquarie Global Leadership Program

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Flowerparty☀ 00:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Macquarie Global Leadership Program]]=

:{{la|Macquarie Global Leadership Program}} ([{{fullurl:Macquarie Global Leadership Program|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macquarie Global Leadership Program}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Wikipedia is not a course prospectus: there is no indication that this one is notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Precedent at previous similar deletion discussions (see WP:OUTCOMES#Education) is that: "Departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are not notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field... or produced a number of notable graduates." Contested PROD. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Merge & redirect to Macquarie University. Insufficient non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Drawn Some (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm not sure how much of the article is mergable (perhaps have one line in the university's article saying that they offer this course?). There are many thousands of educational institutions, both public and private, and each offers over 100 courses. They are not all notable! I see no reason to even hint that promoters can put articles or redirects about each of their courses here (although I suppose there are half a dozen in the entire world that would pass WP:GNG). Johnuniq (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - no coverage to indicate this program is notable, and it is unclear due to the lack of coverage if even a merge is appropriate. -- Whpq (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.