Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madakkavil (2nd nomination)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 22:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
--Sri (talk) 09:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)i am a member of the madakkavil family and i had read what was written... and that was true... i had wondered who took the pain to do such a detail study on my famiy.... i want to confirm that the content in that is true and still exist... ===Madakkavil===
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madakkavil}}
:{{la|Madakkavil}} ([{{fullurl:Madakkavil|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madakkavil (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Largely unsourced article about a family in India. The first nomination closed with "no consensus"; some editors expressed the hope that substantial independent sources could be added to the article over time. As a matter of fact, this has not happened for more than 1 1/2 years now. Hence I propose to delete the article as failing WP:N. --B. Wolterding (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless we can locate some reliable sources to establish notability during the priod of this AFD. I tried locating sources, but Google Books/Scholar/News have zero hits and none of the hits on the web (besides wikipedia and its mirrors) seem to be useful. Abecedare (talk) 17:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unlikely acceptable sources exist. Doctorfluffy (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Previous AfD provided an opportunity to satisfy the requirements of WP:N and WP:RS, but neither has been. Jfire (talk) 21:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable family history. The details given on the page dont really make the family notable, as almost all families in the region would have a similar tale to narrate. Wikipedia is not a genealogical directory.--thunderboltz(TALK) 19:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Just as Wikipedia is not a directory of European surnames, it should not be a directory of Indian clan names. —BradV 15:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.