Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddy Lewis

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Maddy Lewis]]=

:{{la|Maddy Lewis}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Maddy Lewis}})

Unsourced vanity article about notable person, full of nonsense and trivia. Orange Mike | Talk 18:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete - I've tried to keep up with the advertorial content of this article for a while but can't. The links and information provided are rampantly unreliable. Not sure why this article wasn't deleted in the first place. The author declined the PROD I placed so I must have seen a claim of notability. If there were any coverage of the subject that would satisfy WP:GNG, it would surely be in the article. My [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22maddy+lewis%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=%22maddy+lewis%22&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=nws&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=5e3eacb6af5a0521&biw=2400&bih=1103 Google News search] and [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22maddy+lewis%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=%22maddy+lewis%22&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=ZQFQTu6RKomdgQe_q_HxBg&ved=0CA8QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=5e3eacb6af5a0521&biw=2400&bih=1103 Google News Archive search] provide no additional references that constitute significant coverage. Also fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO. OlYeller^Talktome 18:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete - I didn't find notable links on Google and Yahoo search engines.SwisterTwister talk 20:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete Aside from the usually otherwise addressable issue of an article written as if a resume, the woman has only a meager handful of film credits, most as decriptiptive rather than named characters.[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1690136/filmotype] And while she does have some slight coverage for her stagework, its not in-depth enough to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.