Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mae Reid
=[[Mae Reid]]=
:{{la|Mae Reid}} – (
:({{findsources|Mae Reid}})
part of a series by someone who liked to create Coquitlam councillor articles. fails WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. nothing really notable about this councillor. limited third party coverage [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Mae+Reid%22+coquitlam&num=10&hl=en&scoring=a]. LibStar (talk) 06:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN, although there is coverage of this woman it is extremely shallow and doesn't cover anything about her career or her life in depth. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN by a long way. In my view, coverage would have to be quite significant to surmount that hurdle. It isn't. --Mkativerata (talk) 06:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- WP:POLITICIAN clearly points out that city councillors (with the possible exception of those in major cities) are not generally deemed notable just for holding office. I'd suggest that listing them in Coquitlam City Council would be the appropriate solution here, but even that title seems to be a redirect to Coquitlam rather than an independent article. Delete, though if an article about the council itself is ever initiated it would be acceptable to redirect the councillors' names to it. Bearcat (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. —Bearcat (talk) 18:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Completely agree with the above. -- Ϫ 13:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.