Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mafia Wars

=[[Mafia Wars]]=

:{{la|Mafia Wars}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mafia Wars}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Mafia Wars}})

Does all Facebook games derserve an article Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 13:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep - not every Facebook game is notable, but this one certainly is - it won a Webby Award, and has attracted significant coverage from reliable sources, as evidenced by the references already in the article, or by e.g. [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1935113,00.html this] or [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/07/AR2009040702240.html this]. Scog (talk) 14:03, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep - plenty of coverage from reliable independent sources, as pointed above.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 15:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep - Nominator doesn't really advance any rationale for deletion. The references already in the article at the time of nomination establish notabiulity. -- Whpq (talk) 15:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep While I agree that the majority of online games aren't notable, Mafia Wars certainly is. Besides winning a Webby (for those who care about that), it's gotten significant coverage: [http://www.homemediamagazine.com/product-news/universal-touts-success-public-enemies-cross-promotion-with-mafia-wars-game-18122][http://www.tgdaily.com/consumer-electronics/45458-facebooks-mafia-wars-is-sort-of-a-compulsive-disorder], among others. TJ Spyke 17:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep: Passes WP:WEB. Joe Chill (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Sounds like an I don't like it nom. The overwhelming popularity of the game and sources go beyond any personal feelings about the game, the notability is secured. Nate (chatter) 00:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.