Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Beare
=[[Maggie Beare]]=
:{{la|Maggie Beare}} ([{{fullurl:Maggie Beare|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Beare}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Merge as above. In practice, one article is enoguh here, -- though its really an editing decision. DGG (talk) 02:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 02:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect page to Mother and Son. Insuffucient notability to warrant separate article. WWGB (talk) 02:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect -- to Mother and Son. - Longhair\talk 09:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Mother and Son. Not much in the way of cited information to keep. -- Mattinbgn\talk 10:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Mother and Son as above, nothing here really worth merging. Possibly also a good idea to do the same to Arthur Beare. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC).
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.