Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Jimenez
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
=[[Maggie Jimenez]]=
:{{la|Maggie Jimenez}} – (
:({{Find sources|Maggie Jimenez}})
Has one article about her, but doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines for BLP Zeusu|c 15:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
:Delete: fails WP:ENTERTAINER. This is the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Maggie+Jimenez&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1&hide_thanks_log=1 third time] this article has been created: once it was deleted by BLP prod, once by G11. Perhaps salting would be in order. G S Palmer (talk) 16:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
::I noticed it had been created in the past -- that's why I put it to AfD this time. Agreed on SALT protection post-this AfD. Zeusu|c 17:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
:Delete - Hopeless case. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.