Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magik (rapper)

:{{la|Magik (rapper)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Magik_(rapper) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Magik (rapper)}})

The very same article was deleted last night, per A7 Widr (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

:Magik is an important part of polish hip-hopolo history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.193.251.9 (talk) 14:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

He may be however there is no sources or refrences to tell us that. WP:ALIVE and WP:NOR Danielj27052705 (talk) 17:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

: Danielj27052705? Why did you mentioned WP:ALIVE??? It was a blunder. --WTM (talk) 18:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

::Check out Jestes Bogiem movie, it's about magik — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.193.251.9 (talk) 18:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

• Can we please try to get this discussion on track, based on evidence from reliable sources? A good start would be a better deletion rationale from the nominator. These seaches are better than the automatically included ones above: {{find|Kaliber 44|Magik}}. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

::This article seems to have no other purpose than being a playground for continuous vandalism. There are no references at all, just dubious YouTube links. No one unfamiliar with the subject can check if the edits are correct or not. I requested a page protection for the original article that was vandalized the same way, but the admin decided to delete it instead with this note: "(A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content))" Widr (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

• Keep. I found some references in Polish, and they look like enough to satisfy WP:BASIC (although this is with the help of Google Translate). It also looks like someone is making a film about him and his fellow rappers.[http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&langpair=pl|en&rurl=translate.google.com&u=http://www.wiadomosci24.pl/artykul/ulotne_chwile_lapie_jak_fotka_84318.html&usg=ALkJrhgJvax_1i8TLDB7gTVEIRY5GwaTnA][http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&langpair=pl|en&rurl=translate.google.com&u=http://www.wiadomosci24.pl/artykul/od_dziesieciu_lat_nie_ma_z_nami_magika_piotra_luszcza_175131.html&usg=ALkJrhhXoBB6hnPcWjbDGFK33-js3fenyw][http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&langpair=pl|en&rurl=translate.google.com&u=http://www.se.pl/archiwum/legenda-magika_135528.html&usg=ALkJrhgx2qCNY_uR-icnTRVG3UiEhJglIA][http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&langpair=pl|en&rurl=translate.google.com&u=http://www.money.pl/archiwum/wiadomosci_agencyjne/pap/artykul/rozpoczely%3Bsie%3Bzdjecia%3Bdo%3Bfilmu%3Bfabularnego%3Bo%3Bzespole%3Bpaktofonika,113,0,776049.html&usg=ALkJrhh45GVZna9YXU5t2hA6gJGRY9JndQ][http://translate.google.com/translate?langpair=pl|en&u=http://www.zw.com.pl/artykul/4,570708.html] — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 11:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

• (copied from the talk page)
• '''Please refer to polish instance: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magik_(raper)

This is a big article, in which whole background and his works were described.

Magik is one of the legends in our polish music culture. Its a disgrace to put this offending links on eng wiki:

^ WYKOP - Diss na Magika vol. 1

^ WYKOP - Diss na Magika vol. 2

Person who wrote the fake article also :

- changed the name of an album to an offending one : Kaliber 44 - Księga Tajemnicza. Proktolog (1996) instead of Ksiega Tajemnicza Prolog

- put wrong personal details in description (Wadowice instead of Jelenia Gora)

- changed the names of crew members

- previous version which I edited, which was then reedited was even more offending than the one that stays now

If you just simply google translate the attached article from polish wiki, you will see many discrepancy within the data.

Thanks in advance.'''

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Viosenka (talk • contribs)

• Keep. The Polish Wikipedia article has plenty of references to sources that clearly demonstrate notability. This should never have been speedily deleted, but rather semi-protected (as has now been done) to protect it from vandalism. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
• Keep. Per Phil; also - a good article on pl wiki, as clearly indicated by the interwiki links. If the indication was present at the time of speedy, I would consider that a review is needed of the administrative actions taken by the admin who deleted it, as at least here we can see a case of a clearly improper execution of a speedy deletion. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.