Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maharani Phool Bai Rathore

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Maharani Phool Bai Rathore]]=

:{{la|Maharani Phool Bai Rathore}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maharani_Phool_Bai_Rathore Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Maharani Phool Bai Rathore}})

The only Google hit that comes up for this person at all is a on a spam blacklist— Google Books had nothing (nothing) at all on her, article has no references of its own, there is no interlanguage link to another Wikipedia, looks like a dead end to me. Claims of being a princess and the wife of a maharaja are all well and good, but without citations to back up the claims, this could all be so much creative writing. Wikipedia is not a creative writing workshop. KDS4444 (talk) 13:07, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete - article seems to be inspired by the 2013-2015 TV show, Bharat Ka Veer Putra – Maharana Pratap. I don't think what we have here passes WP:NOR. Smmurphy^(Talk) 16:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete -- Even if fully referenced and wikified, I think she would still be a NN minor member of a royal family. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.