Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahidhara Nalini Mohan Rao

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

=[[Mahidhara Nalini Mohan Rao]]=

:{{la|Mahidhara Nalini Mohan Rao}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mahidhara_Nalini_Mohan_Rao Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mahidhara Nalini Mohan Rao}})

Basically unsourced article with one link that appears to be a blog, but from what I can tell, doesn't cover what the article says. Of all my searches, [https://www.google.com/search?q=Mahidhara+Nalini+Mohan+Rao&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 Books] was the only one that found a few results ([https://books.google.com/books?id=xXwoAQAAMAAJ&q=Mahidhara+Nalini+Mohan+Rao&dq=Mahidhara+Nalini+Mohan+Rao&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mf1dVe60MovMsAWK-YEY&ved=0CDkQ6AEwBg this] particular one supports the Indira Gandhi Award but that's pretty much it). Searches at News, Scholar, thefreelibrary and highbeam so it's likely good sources are non-English and offline but I don't see why this article should be kept given the longtime issues. SwisterTwister talk 15:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete - I think this might even qualify for speedy delete under A7. There's really no claim made to anything notable about him, let alone providing any reliable sources. I defer to nominator that there's nothing online out there that would help with this article. I think clearly fails WP:BASIC. mikeman67 (talk) 14:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.