Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahip Riar

:{{la|Mahip Riar}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mahip_Riar Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mahip Riar}})

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator on the basis that the Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina is fully pro, an assertion contradicted by reliable sources cited at WP:FPL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 06:58, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 07:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:28, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
• Strong delete Totally and completely fails the notability guidelines for footballers, which allow for way too many people to be considered notable as it is. 2nd and 3rd string league players should not be considered notable, no matter how fully pro the leagues are.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - hasn't played a fully pro game Spiderone 12:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.