Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majid Rafizadeh
=[[Majid Rafizadeh]]=
:{{la|Majid Rafizadeh}} – (
:({{Find sources|Majid Rafizadeh}})
This article is just an absurd overlinked WP:COI, WP:Advert with no clear indication of WP:Notability. Plot Spoiler (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nominator Now that the article has been completely revamped and cleaned up, I now see that there are sufficient reliable sources on the subject to fulfill notability. This article must still be watched though for WP:Advert, WP:NPOV, and WP:COI concerns. Especially COI - far too many sock puppets flying around this page. Plot Spoiler (talk) 21:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks Plot Spoiler agree with all your points and note the sock-puppet issue too. Seeing as I spent a lot of time resolving the many issues with the article I will be keeping a close eye on it. Best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 01:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep - [http://www.france24.com/en/20120831-syria-majid-rafizadeh-kidnap-family-targetted-civil-war-shabiha-opposition-bashar-assad suggest this] and [http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/08/world/meast/syria-shiites this] suggests the subject is notable. Definitely overlinked and there has been an issue with COI but can be saved and a number of editors are assisting. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Keep - [http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/08/world/meast/syria-shiites suggest notability]. The page has been up for a while. Sandrkam (talk) 00:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Sandrkam (talk) 00:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
::{{user|Sandrkam|}} has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. —Mikemoral♪♫ 02:07, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comment - I have done a major overhaul of this article. Citations are properly formatted, meets NPOV, puffery deleted and there are some decent secondary sources. A few primary sources confirm claims of 'editor' etc and as such are appropriate as there is no interpretation. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.