Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Mano

=[[Major Mano]]=

:{{la|Major Mano}} ([{{fullurl:Major Mano|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Mano}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable Tamil Tiger, article devoid of biographical detail; cursory passing mentions of pseudo-position do not add up to notability meriting separate article. THF (talk) 18:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

::*Extra Comment - also mentioned in The Nation (Thailand) on June 14, 2005, Tuesday PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

:::*Comment: He was actually killed by the LRRP, not a key player in it. I'm not sure if getting killed by a particular military organization makes you notable. Chamal talk 10:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

  • keep, or possibly merge - 'Devoid of biographical detail' is not a reason for deletion. He does hold a position from what I can see: [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22major+mano%22+tamil&btnG=Search&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&hs=P5w&sa=2 Even a quick Google search] shows up notability. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  • :comment. if you search wioth -wikipedia, your hits get a lot less.Jasy jatere (talk) 15:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - "I am too lazy to look something up" isnt a valid reason for deletion.Pectoretalk 22:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

::Again, I've looked it up. The passing mentions in the press does not add up to notability, which is an objective Wikipedia standard. Please stop your personal attacks. THF (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

::I have made no personal attacks, but I did summarize your rationale for deletion in a somewhat blunt manner.Pectoretalk 02:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.