Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Samuel Morrow

:{{la|Major Samuel Morrow}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Major_Samuel_Morrow Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Major Samuel Morrow}})

Wholly non-notable; Google, Google Books, and Jstor searches find minimal information on any Samuel Moore of the time period listed GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 12:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

• Perhaps that's because you misspelled his name? It's "Morrow", not "Moore". [https://www.google.nl/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Major+Samuel+Morrow%22&gws_rd=cr&ei=c_uFWMWcEurHgAaM967IDw The correct one] seems to yield notability. Kleuske (talk) 12:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

::Sorry for the mis-spelling in the edit summary, there was a floating text block blocking my view, and I tried to put the edit summary in blind. Samuel Morrow is indeed mentioned in passing in a number of religious history books, but as far as notability, I don't see it. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 13:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - He was a church elder and fought in the Revolution. Nothing wrong with that but I don't see see anything notable.Glendoremus (talk) 06:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

• Delete - not notable; per GNG and WP:Memorial applies. Kierzek (talk) 15:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Article does not demonstrate notability. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.