Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Street-basketball Foundation
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 04:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
=[[:Major Street-basketball Foundation]]=
:{{la|1=Major Street-basketball Foundation}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Major Street-basketball Foundation}})
Fails the notability guideline for organisations. Close to G11-worthy. I'm stunned this article has managed to stick around in this state since 2006 and even gets a link in Index of Australia-related articles. Only bringing to AfD since it does get a paragraph in the [https://web.archive.org/web/20060821084744/http://www.smh.com.au/news/basketball/goahead-basketball-needs-a-network-to-net-new-audience/2006/05/26/1148524892029.html Sydney Morning Herald] The only other sources I found were short pieces in local newspapers that fail WP:AUD. I'm happy to email full text to anyone who is interested, but they really weren't adequate. – Teratix ₵ 03:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Basketball, and Australia. – Teratix ₵ 03:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- delete. close to no presence in the internets. - Altenmann >talk 03:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Sources don't establish notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete poorly sourced, in any case fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 03:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.