Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maledicta

:{{la|Maledicta}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Maledicta}})

I couldn't find any reliable sources on Maledicta, having done a Credo reference search and Google search. The article meets WP:NBOOK, however, it lacks citations to reliable sources and I couldn't find any academic publications on "Maledicta". —James ^{(Talk • Contribs)} • 9:42am • 23:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

• Keep. A well-known and well-regarded academic journal. In general, you can't expect notable academic journals to have been the specific subject of publications in reliable sources: just try finding such for, say, the Journal of Economic Theory; even for respectably old ones this may be difficult (e.g. American Journal of Psychology).  --Lambiam 00:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
• Keep - [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=maledicta&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives lots of coverage in the mainstream non-academic press] over the years. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
• Keep. You say you can't find any sources on Maledicta; did you even bother to look at its own webpage, which contains [http://aman.members.sonic.net/uncle_news.html a lengthy list of reviews, references, and mainstream news articles on the journal and its associated publications from 1996 onwards]? —Psychonaut (talk) 08:42, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
• Keep John Vandenberg ^(chat) 21:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Poorly-thought over AfD on my part, I didn't search archives so I'd request the AfD be closed. Thanks. —James ^{(Talk • Contribs)} • 11:16am • 01:16, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.