Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamaearth

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Mamaearth}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamaearth}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Mamaearth}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Mamaearth]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Mamaearth}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mamaearth}})

Promotional article that does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. All of the references appear to be routine coverage and press announcements. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 15:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

:The organization is genuine and doesn't seem to be a promotional article. I think it needs more editing in terms of the information written other than that, the deletion request should be removed. Thekaransingha (talk) 05:46, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete - likely undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the creator for this. MER-C 10:10, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.