Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandy Heng

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

=[[Mandy Heng]]=

:{{la|Mandy Heng}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mandy_Heng Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mandy Heng}})

Been aware of this for a while, occasionally looked for sources as I thought to have a quick check, but after another unsuccessful search, I'm afraid I think it's time to ask whether Heng is notable. I see no in-depth articles on her work, really very little coverage (and generally passing mentions of the "Someone wore Mandy Heng somewhere, someone else wore somebody else..." type.) If there IS coverage worth mentioning, it's really not readily accessible. Sorry Mandy... Mabalu (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete as non notable woman. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete I think it's a bit too soon for this promising young designer. But if substantial coverage in reliable independent sources occurs woul be happy to see recreation an expansion of the article. Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.