Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangroomer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

=[[Mangroomer]]=

:{{la|Mangroomer}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangroomer}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Mangroomer}})

Non-notable brand product. Has been prodded and declined. Per WP:PRODUCT this should either be merged into the nearest parent article (doesn't appear to be one) or deleted. SilkTork *YES! 00:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep - Seems to have sufficient independent sources on the product itself showing. Carrite (talk) 01:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete; notability marginal at best; article created by banned user and sockmaster User:Grundle2600. PhGustaf (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

:This was done before he was socking. as such it is sourced and should be kept. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep What does "Non-notable brand product." mean? This is an article on a product, and the NYT at least has given it coverage. It's not the wheel or the mousetrap perhaps, but it's a real product and it has real 3rd party coverage to our usual WP:N standards.

: As a very small article, I wouldn't object to it being merged with electric razors.

: The sins of its original creator are simply an irrelevance. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete Not every product that shows up on a tv infomercial needs an article and when it appears in a few human interest news stories and the business section like andy warhol says everything is famous for fifteen minutes. 207.81.170.99 (talk) 05:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.