Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manika sharma

=[[Manika sharma]]=

{{ns:0|B}}

:{{la|Manika sharma}} ([{{fullurl:Manika sharma|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manika sharma}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

questionable notability: assistant director of a bollywood film, unreferenced director of a yet to be released film, smells of vanity ccwaters (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

:See also Kalpvriksh. ccwaters (talk) 15:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Feels like blatant self-promotion. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article doesn't really assert notability and is written in a promotional tone. Google turned up few hits with nothing reliable to indicate notability. I'm gonna agree with the others and say this is vanityspam. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 18:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete -a promotional article. I can't verify its claims to notability, and even if I could they're pretty weak. Also fails Geogre's Law. Reyk YO! 22:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per above, plus User:Kalpvriksh took down the AfD template to his own page when the discussion was underway. --Themfromspace (talk) 08:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity. I wouldn't be surprised, if we have an article about Kalpvriksh the movie coming soon. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment It came and was speedily deleted... twice. --Themfromspace (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment—An IP address deleted the AfD headers [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manika_sharma&diff=230147905&oldid=230147840 diff]. I added them back in and warned the IP. Just FYI. Livitup (talk) 07:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.