Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mansurchak

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus that GEOLAND applies (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Mansurchak]]=

:{{la|Mansurchak}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mansurchak Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mansurchak}})

No indication of notability and no sources beyond government census documents. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Keep per WP:GEOLAND, legally populated places are notable, this one even has its own census sub-block as a minor "regional center". Does need better sources. SportingFlyer talk 06:26, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Keep GEOLAND. SpinningSpark 17:00, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Keep scope_creep (talk) 19:09, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep — The very first criterion of WP:GEOLAND mandates that legally recognised and populated places are generally considered inherently notable. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 09:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.