Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mantanis-model

:{{la|Mantanis-model}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mantanis-model Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mantanis-model}})

Seems to be an abstract of someone's PhD research project. Not at all clear why this is notable, no examples of commercial or other use. Just another piece of research Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

• Delete just someone's PhD project. --Jakob (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
• Comment I flagged the same article for speedy deletion earlier as it was copied from a webpage (sorry for forgetting the URL), but this time copying and pasting phrases in quotes does not yield any exact matches. This article seems very similar to its previous incarnation, so the creator may have just changed a few words to prevent copyvio detection.
  Edit: The old Mantanis-model article was created by a different user, Mantanis (talk) (contribs). The logs state that the account Papadopoulos-Antonios (talk) (contribs) (the creator of the current article) was created just 1 day ago (March 10^th). I have informed Papadopoulos-Antonios (talk) (contribs) about this, and I suspect that his account was created to disassociate the new article from the speedied one. Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

• Delete. No sources, no notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC).
• Speedy delete. Blanked by page creator. Passengerpigeon (talk) 09:48, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.