Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manterrupting

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Manterrupting}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Manterrupting Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Manterrupting}})

Seems like a piece together through original research or WP:SYNTH rather than a notable topic. Isingness (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep because it is notorious like any other similar term (Mansplaining, Manspreading) and can be expanded and improved by translating the article from [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manterruption German] and [https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manterrupting French]. I just gave the initial kick. Holy Goo (talk) 22:16, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep. I might cull the information about the app as undue weight, but there's certainly enough out there to expand this into a very credible article. Despite the recent coinage of the term, a [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C31&q=manterrupting&btnG= Google Scholar] search is surprisingly productive, for example. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 22:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

• Merge into Interruption_(speech)#Manterrupting which is the same topic plus more context.Andrew D. (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect into Interruption_(speech)#Manterrupting where's it already appropriately covered, per Andrew D. --Lockley (talk) 04:18, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
• That doesn't make sense to me. Manterrupting is an independent term. It'd be like reducing "Mansplaining" to explanation. --Holy Goo (talk) 13:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per Andrew D, but maybe to the broader section Interruption (speech)#Gender and interruption patterns, where the awkward separate section could be better explained in context. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 03:18, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete (or merge) this article seems to give undue weight to a word that does not seem to be very well established. I would be open to change my mind if the article was improved. wikitigresito (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per Andrew D--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 03:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.