Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maralyn Parker

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

=[[Maralyn Parker]]=

:{{la|Maralyn Parker}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maralyn Parker}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Maralyn Parker}})

This article is about a newspaper columnist that has no significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. As a columnist, google news turns up articles by her but not much about her. [http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/paper-defends-publishing-schools-data-20100129-n3gb.html], [http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/muslim-rage-burns-in-our-backyard/2005/07/20/1121539032464.html], and [http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/17028] are some passing mentions. That article claims she has written several education books. A google [http://www.google.com/search?q=Maralyn+Parker&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=d5X&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&tbs=bks%3A1&q=inauthor%3A%22Maralyn+Parker%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=ac3b1f8641813cbe book search] confirms this but I can find no critical coverage or indication that these books have attracted notice. She also claims a couple of rewards related education related journalism. However, I find no coverage to indicate these are significant awards. Whpq (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete No indication that Parker meets notability criteria for inclusion; no significant coverage in independent sources and the awards do not appear to be significant enough to cement notability. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 16:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 03:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete per nominator. Strange Passerby (talk) 08:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.