Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcos A. Aidukaitis

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theo polisme 21:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

=[[Marcos A. Aidukaitis]]=

:{{la|Marcos A. Aidukaitis}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marcos_A._Aidukaitis Stats])

:({{Find sources|Marcos A. Aidukaitis}})

Doesn't appear to have any reliable, independent (i.e. not tied in with the LDS church of which he is an official) sources. Therefore, delete. PROD declined by article creator p b p 17:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep We have accepted that members of the 1st Quorum of the 70 are notable by virtue of their office. The general trend of various discussion has been that they hold a high enough office that it gives them notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

::"We" must not be referring to the entire community, because no such policy or guideline delineates that 1st Quorum members are notable. What DOES make someone notable are sources. Go find some. p b p 18:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep: See my rationale at the related Articles for deletion/Michael John U. Teh. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 01:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Keep - the person is clearly notable and the nom's insistence on non-LDS sources is bizarre. 'Independent' means 'independent of MAA', not 'independent of MAA and all his interests'. Oculi (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Keep per arguments made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia T. Holland and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael John U. Teh. ~Adjwilley (talk) 21:07, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.